EU\u2013Ukraine Defence Industries Forum<\/a>, co-organized in May 2024 by the EDA, European Commission, and European External Action Service (EEAS). The forum convened key stakeholders, including HR\/VP Josep Borrell and senior Ukrainian officials, and enabled direct dialogue between EU and Ukrainian defence industry representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIn this light, EU\u2013Ukraine cooperation in defence is not simply a support mechanism for Ukraine-it has become a cornerstone of the broader effort to build European defence and military readiness. This partnership strengthens the security of the entire continent and positions Ukraine as a strategic asset in shaping Europe\u2019s evolving security order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The US must remain present in the European security architecture<\/strong> and actively support the integration of Ukraine\u2019s defence sector into EU frameworks. Despite shifting global priorities, Washington has compelling reasons to maintain its role in Europe, at least in the short to mid-term, while continuing to incentivize the development of a common European defence. Doing so will help deter China and other potential adversaries, while ensuring that Russia\u2019s aggression against Ukraine is not rewarded and that the transatlantic alliance remains strategically cohesive in the face of current and future challenges.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nConclusions: Towards a Post-American European Security Order<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nRussia\u2019s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the US\u2019 ongoing pivot to Asia have placed Europe in a difficult position. Historically, views on strengthening European defence have varied on both sides of the Atlantic, evolving alongside shifting geopolitical conditions and power balances. The return of high-intensity war has reintroduced hard (military) security to Europe\u2019s agenda, while the prospect of partial US disengagement has only reinforced the urgency of developing a common European defence and the capabilities required for Europe to protect itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What is currently unfolding in transatlantic security can rightfully be described as a transition to a post-American European security order. \u201cPost-American\u201d in this context does not suggest a total US withdrawal from Europe<\/strong> or the dissolution of NATO. Rather, it signals the acceleration of Washington\u2019s strategic refocus on the Indo-Pacific and a shifting of defence responsibilities to European allies.<\/p>\n\n\n\nOngoing tensions and mutual criticisms between Europe and the US are counterproductive. They risk weakening the transatlantic bond and handing a strategic advantage to adversaries like Russia and China, both of whom seek to sow discord among allied democracies.<\/strong> What is needed instead is deeper EU\u2013US communication and coordinated planning around specific milestones, deliverables, and timelines for responsibly rebalancing America\u2019s military footprint. These conversations must include Ukraine, which is not only a key frontline state but also a growing partner in European defence production and strategic planning. Ukraine\u2019s integration into these efforts would enhance European military readiness, foster greater strategic autonomy, and strengthen the European pillar within NATO, an essential element of democratic resilience and continental security.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe foundations for the EU to become a more geopolitical and security-oriented actor are now in place<\/strong>. But transforming strategic ambitions into operational outcomes will require clear alignment among the US, the EU, and key partners like Ukraine. To that end, a Comprehensive Road Map<\/strong> outlining a division of labor for European defence development is urgently needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe upcoming NATO Summit in The Hague could prove pivotal<\/strong>. It offers an opportunity to present concrete proposals for advancing this new defence agenda and could serve as a test of whether Brussels and Washington are capable of narrowing differences and rebuilding strategic consensus. An updated Joint Declaration on EU\u2013NATO Cooperation <\/strong>could serve as the vehicle to launch this much-needed Road Map.<\/p>\n\n\n\nEU leadership appears <\/strong>to be serious and ready to step up<\/strong>. In her Aachen speech<\/a>, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized that Europe must craft a new form of Pax Europaea for the 21st century-one that is shaped and safeguarded by Europeans themselves. While she acknowledged NATO\u2019s and the transatlantic alliance\u2019s historic role in providing Europe\u2019s security, she also declared that the era of peace dividends is over. Speaking at the European Defence and Security Summit on 10 June 2025, Commissioner Andrius Kubilius underscored<\/a> that while the EU is not at war, it acts in times of war. The EU, he argued, must build up its defence readiness, revitalise its defence industry, and help construct a new European security architecture.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIf the EU fails to meet its goals for defence preparedness or proves unable to sustain support for Ukraine in repelling Russian aggression, the consequences could be severe. A<\/strong>n impulsive<\/strong>, uncoordinated, and chaotic US retreat from European security would harm both sides of the Atlantic.<\/strong> <\/strong>The EU, NATO, Ukraine, and other like-minded partners must therefore set aside secondary differences and cooperate on building a shared vision for the post-American European security order. If they do not, that order will be shaped instead by Russia and its allies<\/strong>, and Europe, if this scenario materializes, may face decades of instability, coercion, and conflict.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\nDisclaimer: The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the papers published on this site belong solely to the authors and not necessarily to the Transatlantic Dialogue Center, its committees, or its affiliated organizations. The papers are intended to stimulate dialogue and discussion and do not represent official policy positions of the Transatlantic Dialogue Center or any other organizations with which the authors may be associated.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
By Vitalii Rishko Introduction: Why Europe Must Build Defence Capacity amid US Rebalancing and Russia\u2019s War The question of building European defence is as old as the process of European integration itself. What began as a peace-oriented project after World War II to guarantee stability on the continent, the European Communities and later the European […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":29941,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29934","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-papers"],"yoast_head":"\n
Building Defence in a Post-American European Security Order: Ukraine\u2019s Integration, Burden-Sharing, and the New Transatlantic Reality - Transatlantic Dialogue Center<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n